---
layout: default
file: "src/FLRP.lagda.md"
title: "FLRP module (The Agda Universal Algebra Library)"
date: "2026-07-11"
author: "the agda-algebras development team"
---
### The Finite Lattice Representation Problem
This is the [FLRP][] module of the [Agda Universal Algebra Library][].
This top-level `FLRP/` tree hosts the library's research program on the
**Finite Lattice Representation Problem**: is every finite lattice isomorphic to the
congruence lattice of a *finite* algebra?
The program's plan (the state of the art, the primary avenue of attack via
interval-enforceable properties, and the breakdown into work packages) lives in
[`docs/notes/flrp-research-roadmap.md`](docs/notes/flrp-research-roadmap.md).
The `FLRP/` tree holds only problem-specific formal content, while reusable
mathematics developed along the way (group actions, subgroup lattices, closure
combinatorics) lives in the `Setoid/`, `Classical/`, and `Order/` trees.
Two standing warnings apply to everything under this namespace.
+ **Research-track separation**. The FLRP is distinct from the algebraic-complexity
/ finite-CSP track and from the Maltsev and interpretability infrastructure, even
where they share modules.
+ **Experimental status**. FLRP modules are research material and are exempt from
the stable-API deprecation discipline until their results stabilize.
**Current submodules**.
+ [FLRP.Problem][] — the representability predicate `Representable`, the
formal statement of the problem, the first worked instance (the one-element
chain), and the constructive no-go theorem for the two-element chain.
+ [FLRP.Enforceable][] — group representability of a lattice, the
interval-enforceability classification (IE, cf-IE, min-IE), the fattening
isomorphism `[H × K, G × K] ≅ [H, G]`, the no-contradictory-IE theorem
(the research note's Lemma 3.2), and hypothesis-parameterized statements of
Lemma 3.1 and the parachute meta-theorem.
+ [FLRP.Bridge][] — the easy (constructive) direction of the Pálfy–Pudlák
correspondence, at both layers: the Layer-S order isomorphism
`Con (𝒢 ↷ 𝒢/H) ≅ [H, 𝒢]` between the semantic congruence lattice of the
transitive G-set of cosets and the respecting upper interval in the subgroup
lattice, and its Layer-D counterpart `DecCon (𝒢 ↷ 𝒢/H) ≅ [H, 𝒢]ᵈ` over the
decidably presented interval (`bridgeᵈ`), proved directly with no classical
assumption, together with the representability corollaries — in particular
`GroupRepresentable→Representableᵈ`: every group-representable lattice is
decidably representable (issue #454).
+ [FLRP.Representable][] — the Layer-D reformulation of the problem:
decidable representability `Representableᵈ`, the statement
`FLRP-Statementᵈ`, and the constructive two-element-chain representation
`chain₂-Representableᵈ` (the object the no-go theorem forbids at Layer S,
attained here with no postulate).
+ [FLRP.Assumptions][] — the registry of classical theorems imported as
explicit hypotheses (never postulates), keeping the tree honest under
`--safe`; Entry 1 is the congruence-completeness bridge
`CongruenceCompleteness`, the single Layer-S→Layer-D assumption of ADR-008,
and Entry 2 is Kurzweil–Netter duality, consumed by the WP-5 closure
toolkit.
+ [FLRP.Closure][] — the WP-5 closure toolkit: product and ordinal-sum
closure of `Representableᵈ` (issue #456), the adjoin-a-new-extremum
corollaries at `chain₂`, and the duality corollary `dual-Representableᵈ`
conditional on the registry's Entry 2.
+ [FLRP.LayerBridge][] — the cross-layer bridge: under the congruence-completeness
assumption, the semantic and decidable congruence posets are order-isomorphic
(`conDecIso`), whence `Representable 𝑳 ↔ Representableᵈ 𝑳`.
+ [FLRP.Certificates][] — machine-checked representation certificates: the
assembly turning a checked whole-lattice certificate (Freese traces and
pointer tables, verified search-free by the
`Setoid.Congruences.Certificates` checkers) into a `Representableᵈ` witness
for the target lattice, so external searches (GAP, UACalc, SAT) enter the
corpus only through the checker.
+ [FLRP.L7EqSix][] — the explicit Pudlák–Tůma witness for the distinguished
open instance: seven partitions of a six-element set (the minimum possible)
forming a sublattice of `Eq(6)` isomorphic to `L7`, with meets, join upper
bounds, injectivity, and normal forms decided over the finite carrier and
join least-ness proved against arbitrary equivalence relations via bounded
alternating chains (issue #484; session note `docs/notes/flrp-l7-eq6.md`).
+ [FLRP.Reductions][] — the RP-2 **enforcement catalog**: the literature's
"an interval of this shape forces a group of this kind" theorems, each recast
as a precise (cf-/min-)IE statement, with the vacuity discipline tracked
entry by entry. Entries 1–3 (the note's classes `𝒢₂`, `𝒢₃`, `𝒢₄`) are
*derived* from the parachute theorems; Entries 4–8 import their sources'
theorems as named hypotheses (Pálfy–Pudlák, Feit, Köhler, Basile, DeMeo's
`L7` analysis, Lucchini–Moscatiello–Palcoux–Spiga). The module also proves
the note's Lemma 3.1, exposes the vacuity theorem
`not-representable→IE`, and repairs `minIE` as `MinimallyIE`; the survey note
is `docs/notes/flrp-rp2-catalog.md`.
**Planned submodules** (per § 6 of the roadmap).
+ `FLRP.Intervals` (intervals in subgroup lattices and core-free normalization).
```agda
{-# OPTIONS --cubical-compatible --exact-split --safe #-}
module FLRP where
open import FLRP.Problem public
open import FLRP.Enforceable public
open import FLRP.Parachute public
open import FLRP.Parachute.Representation public
open import FLRP.Parachute.Theorems public
open import FLRP.Reductions public
open import FLRP.Bridge public
open import FLRP.Representable public
open import FLRP.Assumptions public
open import FLRP.Closure public
open import FLRP.KurzweilInterval public
open import FLRP.LayerBridge public
open import FLRP.Certificates public
open import FLRP.L7EqSix public
```